• 5 mins read
  • Published

Retirement Savings Can Run Short Without a Market Crash

Jenny Kerr Personal Finance Contributor FinancialSumo

Post by Jenny Kerr

Retirement Savings Can Run Short Without a Market Crash FinancialSumo © financialsumo.com
Retirement Savings Can Run Short Without a Market Crash © financialsumo.com

Market losses are only part of retirement risk. Spending habits and withdrawal timing can put savings under pressure too.

Before choosing when to claim Social Security, retirees need to map expected income against the spending they plan to cover. Poorly timed withdrawals, spending that fails to adjust as conditions change and unrealistic expense estimates can all strain savings, according to financial planners Melissa Caro of My Retirement Network and Michael Espinosa of TrueNorth Retire.

The first decision is whether savings and expected income can support the retirement a person plans to live.

In an illustrative calculation, monthly spending of $6,000 minus $4,000 in Social Security leaves a $2,000 monthly gap. Applying a 4% withdrawal rate to that shortfall points to roughly $600,000 in investments; it is an example, not a universal rule.

Morningstar

Espinosa recommends starting with intended spending, rather than picking a retirement age and assuming the finances will work out. A financial planner can turn that target into a savings and investment plan. The estimate should remain a working plan, not a one-time calculation: travel may raise costs early in retirement. Later, health care and home maintenance can become more expensive.

Guessing is a costly substitute for a budget.

Retirees who do not track expenses may underestimate what they spend, Espinosa warns. Caro cautions against assuming costs automatically fall when a paycheck ends. New hobbies and travel can add expenses, while familiar spending habits often continue after work income stops. Comparing actual costs with the plan gives retirees a chance to respond before withdrawals outpace what their savings can support.

Market risk makes withdrawal timing matter. Selling investments after a downturn to cover routine bills can lock in losses and leave less of the portfolio positioned to benefit from a recovery. Caro recommends keeping five years of income needs in safer assets. Those could include cash or certificates of deposit; short-term bonds are another option. She advises leaving the bulk of savings invested. The available research does not independently verify her five-year guideline, so it remains Caro's recommendation, not an established rule.

Morningstar describes a retirement portfolio as a diversified mix of stocks and bonds. That framing treats the portfolio as a source of income over time, rather than relying on a single asset type.

Morningstar

That approach is meant to reduce pressure to sell stocks at an unfavorable moment. It cannot eliminate investment risk or guarantee that a portfolio will last. The right balance depends on a retiree's income needs and financial circumstances. Cash and short-term holdings serve a different purpose from investments intended to grow over a longer period.

Five years of safer assets may help bridge a market downturn, but they cannot make an unaffordable spending plan sustainable. A plan built around actual expenses needs regular review as circumstances change.

Caro says withdrawals should respond to market conditions: spending can rise when markets are strong and tighten in down years. In practice, retirees may need to postpone discretionary costs such as travel when their plan comes under strain. Taking on debt can make it harder to adjust everyday spending. A fixed annual budget may feel predictable, yet leave little room for rising costs or a market decline. The available research does not independently confirm how the sequence of returns affects outcomes, so this flexibility is a planning consideration, not a guarantee.

Social Security belongs in the plan, but anxiety about the program should not crowd out decisions retirees can make themselves. The source material cites a projection that the trust fund paying retirement and survivor benefits would be depleted in 2032. It says continuing income would then cover about 78% of scheduled benefits if Congress did not act. The available research could not independently verify those figures against a Social Security Administration or trustees' report. They should be treated as projections cited in the source material, not confirmed current figures. The projection describes a reduction from scheduled benefits, not a forecast that payments disappear entirely.

Morningstar's retirement-income discussion describes Social Security as lifetime income protected from inflation, a feature to weigh alongside private savings rather than use as a substitute, according to its retirement-income analysis. The available research includes no verified current Social Security figures or official decisions that would support a more definitive update.

Caro says possible adjustments could include smaller cost-of-living increases or higher taxes. Later eligibility is another possibility. Younger workers may leave more room for private savings and work decisions by planning without relying on Social Security to fill every gap. For people closer to retirement, the practical questions include when to claim and how long to keep earning income. Those choices should be weighed against the household's broader plan, not made out of fear about headlines.

Cash reserves and invested assets play different roles. A reserve can cover near-term needs without forcing a sale of volatile investments during a downturn, while longer-term investments remain exposed to market swings. Morningstar's discussion says retirees do not necessarily have to limit withdrawals to interest and dividends. It does not offer a personalized withdrawal recommendation.

Related articles