• 5 mins read
  • Published

Dividend Stocks Can Give Beginners a Steadier Starting Point

Walter Updegrave Personal Finance Columnist FinancialSumo

Post by Walter Updegrave

Dividend Stocks Can Give Beginners a Steadier Starting Point FinancialSumo © financialsumo.com
Dividend Stocks Can Give Beginners a Steadier Starting Point © financialsumo.com

Dividend growers have historically delivered stronger returns with lower measured volatility than dividend cutters. But payouts are never guaranteed, and the long-term record cannot predict what new investors will earn.

A dividend-paying company may send cash to shareholders while they own its shares. That gives investors another source of return besides a rising share price.

For beginners, dividends can offer a useful starting point. The case rests on past performance and business cash flow, not a promise that dividend stocks will outperform in the future.

From 1973 through 2025, companies that grew their dividends or initiated payouts returned about 13% annually, compared with 11.5% for companies that paid no dividends.

Ned Davis Research

What the long record shows

A Ned Davis Research study of stock performance since 1973 found a wide gap between groups with different dividend policies. Dividend growers and companies that began paying dividends returned an annual average of 10.22%. Companies that made no change to their dividend policy returned 6.87%. Non-dividend payers returned 4.21%. Dividend cutters and eliminators lost an average of 0.96% a year. A separate comparison covering 1973-2023 put dividend stocks' annualized return at 9.18%, versus 3.95% for non-payers, according to this long-term performance analysis. It used a different measurement window and grouping.

The study also found lower measured volatility among dividend growers and companies that started payouts. Their beta was 0.89 and standard deviation was 15.97%. For dividend cutters and eliminators, beta was 1.22 and standard deviation was 24.80%. Those are historical group results, not forecasts for any stock or fund. In a separate 1973-2025 comparison, dividend growers and initiators had a beta of 0.94, versus 1.11 for non-payers. Their historical volatility was about 27% lower. Hartford Funds, working with Ned Davis Research, has also estimated that dividend income made up roughly one-third of stock total return over the past 85 years.

Those numbers are history. They support weighing income alongside risk, but they do not make dividends a shield against losses.

Morningstar reports that the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index fell less than the broad U.S. market in the down years of 2018 and 2022. It also held up better during the market turbulence of March and April 2025 and in weak months of 2026; this historical pattern does not guarantee future resilience.

Morningstar

How dividends shape returns

A dividend is a share of a company's earnings paid to shareholders. Many companies pay quarterly. Others pay monthly or annually. Companies that can keep up and raise their payouts often have established businesses and cash flow. But the board decides whether to pay a dividend. It is not a contractual obligation. If the company's finances or economic conditions worsen, it can freeze, cut, or end the payout.

Investors can earn returns through share-price changes and dividend income. That income may help support total returns when a stock's price is weak. It cannot prevent a loss if the share price falls by more than the cash received. Some technology and artificial-intelligence companies do not pay dividends because they use cash to expand. Their shareholders depend more on price appreciation.

The difference matters when comparing investment styles. Growth stocks can deliver large gains, but they can also fall sharply. During the early-2000s technology bust, the Nasdaq-100 lost more than 80% of its value. Dividend investing can reduce exposure to some higher-risk growth companies. It cannot remove broad stock-market risk.

Using funds to get started

Choosing individual dividend stocks takes research into a company's finances and its ability to keep paying. A dividend ETF can spread an investment across a basket of companies, though each fund uses its own selection rules and still carries stock-market risk. The WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend ETF (DTD) offers exposure to a broad range of dividend stocks. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and ProShares S &P; 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) focus on long-term dividend growth.

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) considers dividend-growth history, balance-sheet quality, and yield when selecting stocks. These approaches differ. A fund focused on dividend growth may not match one that screens a broad dividend universe or targets a particular yield profile. This VIG risk analysis explains why a long record of payout increases is no shield against a bear market.

Keep the risks in view

A dividend strategy does not need to make up an entire portfolio. The source material points to technology and international stocks as possible additions over time. The right mix depends on an investor's goals, time horizon, and tolerance for losses. A fund's distribution is only one part of its total return. Investors also need to consider share-price changes and the chance that companies cut their payouts.

Dividend funds offer one way to invest in established companies. They are not a substitute for diversification or a guarantee of steadier results. Their history gives beginners a reason to study business durability and total return. The risk of payout cuts and market declines remains.

Related articles