• 4 mins read
  • Published

Three ETFs to Consider Before a Downturn

Walter Updegrave Personal Finance Columnist FinancialSumo

Post by Walter Updegrave

Three ETFs to Consider Before a Downturn FinancialSumo © financialsumo.com
Three ETFs to Consider Before a Downturn © financialsumo.com

Healthcare stocks and bonds may cushion some recession pressure, while broad-market funds keep stock exposure in the mix. The trade-offs include company concentration and the risk that bonds lose value when rates rise.

Since 1957, the S&P 500 has weathered 10 official U.S. recessions. Investors who try to avoid every downturn face another risk: they may sell after a decline and miss part of a recovery. Healthcare stocks, bonds and broad U.S. equities offer different kinds of exposure. None guarantees protection from losses.

The historical record cuts both ways. The index has suffered steep, double-digit bear-market declines. The supplied figures also put its total annual return at 10% over the period they describe. That long-term result does not predict what happens next or prevent losses along the way.

One 2026 review cited an average bear-market duration of about 9.6 months. That historical average is not a forecast for any particular downturn.

Ground News

Defensive does not mean immune

People still need medicines, treatment and insurance during a downturn, so healthcare spending can be less sensitive to economic cycles. The Vanguard Healthcare ETF (VHT) tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index and holds 416 stocks. Independent descriptions put its assets at about $19.3 billion. A Zacks ETF analysis also identifies the benchmark. The largest positions are Eli Lilly at 12.8%, Johnson & Johnson at 8.7%, AbbVie at 6.3%, Merck at 5% and UnitedHealth Group at 4.9%.

That is less company-specific than a single-stock position. Sector risk remains. VHT charges a 0.09% expense ratio and has returned 757% in total since its January 2004 inception, according to the supplied figures. The figures do not specify an end date for that measurement. Past performance is not a forecast.

A recent account of RBC analysis examined S&P 500 declines of roughly 11% or more from record highs dating back to 1956. The review provides historical context for market drawdowns, but does not predict when another decline will occur.

Investing.com

Healthcare may hold up better than businesses that depend more on a strong economy. But a healthcare fund can still fall with the market. Its largest holding alone makes up a meaningful share of the portfolio.

It is no shield.

Bonds depend on rate moves

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) spreads its holdings across 11,421 bonds. Its average yield to maturity is 5%. Reported holdings include U.S. government bonds at 68.9%, BBB-rated bonds at 12.3% and A-rated bonds at 12.1%. The fund charges a 0.03% expense ratio and has returned 73% in total since its April 2007 inception. A current Mitrade market review also lists a 30-day SEC yield of 4.98% and an average effective maturity of 8.2 years. The SEC yield is a standardized measure, not a guaranteed return.

Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction from market yields. When rates fall, existing bonds with higher coupons can become more valuable. That can support a bond fund's price. But a recession does not guarantee rate cuts. Bond prices can fall when yields rise, and BND holds corporate debt as well as government bonds. Its value does not depend only on U.S. Treasury rates.

The label "defensive" does not tell the whole story. Dividend screening can find companies with established payout histories, but it cannot prevent stock losses. A bond allocation can diversify a portfolio. It cannot make the portfolio loss-proof.

Broad stocks keep a role

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) tracks the S&P 500 and charges 0.03%. Its portfolio holds large U.S. companies such as Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet. VOO has returned 827% in total since its September 2010 inception, based on the supplied figures. The period's end date is not provided.

A broad index fund will not shelter investors from a market selloff. VOO could fall more than healthcare stocks or bonds during a crash. Its recovery depends on the companies it holds. The case for keeping it is different: patient investors have historically benefited from owning a broad slice of U.S. businesses instead of trying to time every downturn.

Each fund has a different focus. VHT concentrates on healthcare, BND holds bonds, and VOO tracks large U.S. stocks. Their reported expense ratios range from 0.03% to 0.09%. Their past total returns cover sharply different periods since inception. A resilient portfolio can still decline. Its mix should fit the investor's time horizon and ability to withstand losses. Calling any one of these ETFs recession-proof would overstate what diversification can do.

Related articles